Applications close Friday. One link in the application form, every founder records or uploads a pitch in the browser, and your screening committee reviews them in one collection instead of a folder of YouTube links and email attachments.
Every accelerator batch, pitch competition, and demo day now asks founders for a video, and almost every one collects it the hard way: an unlisted YouTube link pasted into a form field, a Loom that expires, a file too big for email. Then someone on the screening side builds the spreadsheet. One collection link removes the whole apparatus. Your prompt states the ask, two minutes on traction, team, and why now. Founders record in the browser or upload the video they cut, no account needed, and re-record until it is the pitch they meant to give. Your reviewers get every submission in one place, each playable on its own. The stitched film is optional; screening is the collection view.
A preview cut from the prompts on this page. Yours will be the clips your people record.
Three steps and a few minutes, and never an editor.
Add a prompt like “Show us your view” and get one shareable link in seconds.
Anyone with the link opens it and records a short clip in their browser. They never install an app or make an account.
We stitch the clips into one film that’s yours to watch, download, and share.
Length limit and the three things you want covered go in the prompt. Every founder sees the same brief.
One field in your application form replaces the paste-your-YouTube-link field forever.
Each submission sits in the collection, full quality, playable on its own.
Share the private link with reviewers. Everyone watches the same set, nobody builds a spreadsheet.
Give contributors a great question, or write your own.
“Two minutes: what you build, who pays, traction, and why now.”
“30 seconds on the founding team and why you three.”
“Screen-record your product doing the one thing it does best.”
“One metric you’re proud of, and the honest story behind it.”
A tight limit is a kindness to founders and reviewers alike, and the discipline shows you who can prioritise.
A second prompt for a screen recording keeps the pitch human and the product proof distinct.
Save the prompt set and every cohort gets the same fair brief with a fresh link.
One link, the same effortless flow, whatever you're collecting for.
Real customer videos, in their own words.
Testimonials →Every tape in one place, no unlisted links.
Collect auditions →Collect honest async video feedback from your team or users.
Video feedback →Collect customer videos at scale, then cut them into one reel.
UGC campaigns →Because founders manage the platform and you inherit the chaos: expired links, wrong visibility settings, a spreadsheet someone has to build and babysit. One link in the application form means every pitch arrives in one collection, none of them hosted on a platform the founder can edit after the deadline.
No. They open the link, see your prompt, and record in the browser or upload a file. Only the program team has an account.
Share the private collection link with your screening committee and everyone reviews the same set. Watching needs no account.
Not for screening: the collection view is the tool, each pitch playable on its own. The film earns its keep later, a highlight reel of the batch for demo day is one compile away.
Free to start, then $0.35 per pitch received on pay as you go, nothing if nobody submits. A 200-application screening round costs about the price of a team lunch.
Yes, until the deadline. You review the pitch they chose to submit, which is fairer to them and better footage for you.
Two minutes to set up, free to create, and nothing to pay until you unlock your videos.
Create your collection